<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 517 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that M/s. VEE, not the appellant, was the manufacturer of the fabricated goods, absolving the appellant from duty payment. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order was overturned, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 517 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that M/s. VEE, not the appellant, was the manufacturer of the fabricated goods, absolving the appellant from duty payment. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order was overturned, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>