<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 513 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to rectify the order through the Rectification of Mistake application, stating it would amount to a review on merits. Despite finding an error in imposing a penalty on the applicant, the Tribunal set aside the penalty, modifying the order to reflect the penalty removal from the applicant while leaving the rest of the order unchanged. The application was disposed of with the Tribunal&#039;s decision pronounced in court on 23/12/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 513 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to rectify the order through the Rectification of Mistake application, stating it would amount to a review on merits. Despite finding an error in imposing a penalty on the applicant, the Tribunal set aside the penalty, modifying the order to reflect the penalty removal from the applicant while leaving the rest of the order unchanged. The application was disposed of with the Tribunal&#039;s decision pronounced in court on 23/12/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>