<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 509 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270717</link>
    <description>Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 empowers rectification of any error apparent on the face of the record and is not limited to clerical or arithmetical mistakes. An error is rectifiable where it is obvious from the record and does not require a long process of reasoning or debate; an order contrary to the statute, binding precedent, or material facts or law may satisfy that standard. The authority rejected the rectification petitions on an unduly narrow view of its power without examining whether such an apparent error existed. The rejection was unsustainable, and the matter had to be reconsidered on merits under Section 84.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:51:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 509 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270717</link>
      <description>Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 empowers rectification of any error apparent on the face of the record and is not limited to clerical or arithmetical mistakes. An error is rectifiable where it is obvious from the record and does not require a long process of reasoning or debate; an order contrary to the statute, binding precedent, or material facts or law may satisfy that standard. The authority rejected the rectification petitions on an unduly narrow view of its power without examining whether such an apparent error existed. The rejection was unsustainable, and the matter had to be reconsidered on merits under Section 84.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>