<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1027 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177628</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment, rendering it null and void. Consequently, the issue of depreciation disallowance on leased assets was deemed academic, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1027 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177628</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment, rendering it null and void. Consequently, the issue of depreciation disallowance on leased assets was deemed academic, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>