<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 729 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177627</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further review regarding the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit and the payment of service tax on tangible goods supplied. The appellant was directed to submit all relevant evidence within 30 days for the adjudicating authority&#039;s review, with a warning that failure to do so would result in a decision based on available records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 729 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177627</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for further review regarding the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit and the payment of service tax on tangible goods supplied. The appellant was directed to submit all relevant evidence within 30 days for the adjudicating authority&#039;s review, with a warning that failure to do so would result in a decision based on available records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>