https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177621 A preventive detention representation sent by speed post to the address stated in the grounds of detention was treated as served where postal records showed delivery, giving rise to a presumption under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. A bare denial by the Union of India was insufficient to rebut that presumption. Because the representation was not disposed of, the Article 22(5) safeguard was breached, and the continued detention was rendered invalid. en-us Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177621 A preventive detention representation sent by speed post to the address stated in the grounds of detention was treated as served where postal records showed delivery, giving rise to a presumption under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. A bare denial by the Union of India was insufficient to rebut that presumption. Because the representation was not disposed of, the Article 22(5) safeguard was breached, and the continued detention was rendered invalid. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177621