<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1543 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177608</link>
    <description>A waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act requires the appellant to plead and establish undue hardship with supporting material; a bare assertion of financial difficulty and prima facie merit is insufficient. The authority must balance undue hardship against protection of revenue, and a direction to deposit less than 10% of the demand reflects a lenient exercise of that discretion. On the facts noted, the pre-deposit order was not shown to be excessive or disproportionate, so interference was not justified and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:17:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1543 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177608</link>
      <description>A waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act requires the appellant to plead and establish undue hardship with supporting material; a bare assertion of financial difficulty and prima facie merit is insufficient. The authority must balance undue hardship against protection of revenue, and a direction to deposit less than 10% of the demand reflects a lenient exercise of that discretion. On the facts noted, the pre-deposit order was not shown to be excessive or disproportionate, so interference was not justified and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>