<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1372 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177602</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the service tax liability for under-declaration of gross value received for providing taxable photography services during 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal by excluding trading income disclosed in sales tax returns for a specific period, resulting in a service tax liability of approximately &amp;amp;8377; 2,50,00,000. The petitioner&#039;s tax liability was ultimately determined to be &amp;amp;8377; 25 lakhs plus interest and penalties. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stayed further proceedings on the condition that the petitioner remits &amp;amp;8377; 12,50,000 plus interest within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1372 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177602</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the service tax liability for under-declaration of gross value received for providing taxable photography services during 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal by excluding trading income disclosed in sales tax returns for a specific period, resulting in a service tax liability of approximately &amp;amp;8377; 2,50,00,000. The petitioner&#039;s tax liability was ultimately determined to be &amp;amp;8377; 25 lakhs plus interest and penalties. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stayed further proceedings on the condition that the petitioner remits &amp;amp;8377; 12,50,000 plus interest within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>