https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177596 A bona fide appellant who filed an appeal in the wrong court on counsel's advice showed sufficient cause for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court applied the settled principle that condonation depends on the facts of each case and must advance the ends of justice, while also respecting that accrued limitation rights are not to be disturbed lightly. On the material before it, the appellant was found free from negligence and lack of bona fides, and the erroneous forum choice was treated as a consequence of mistaken legal advice. The delay was therefore excused and relief under Section 5 granted. en-us Tue, 15 Nov 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:18:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177596 A bona fide appellant who filed an appeal in the wrong court on counsel's advice showed sufficient cause for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court applied the settled principle that condonation depends on the facts of each case and must advance the ends of justice, while also respecting that accrued limitation rights are not to be disturbed lightly. On the material before it, the appellant was found free from negligence and lack of bona fides, and the erroneous forum choice was treated as a consequence of mistaken legal advice. The delay was therefore excused and relief under Section 5 granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Nov 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177596