<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 888 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177594</link>
    <description>The application for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal was dismissed, along with the application for condonation of the initial 8-day delay in filing the appeal. The court emphasized the strict application of limitation laws, highlighting the importance of adhering to timelines without leniency for negligent behavior. The dismissal was based on the principle that limitations must be enforced rigorously, without room for compassionate or equitable considerations in cases of misrepresentation or negligence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 888 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177594</link>
      <description>The application for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal was dismissed, along with the application for condonation of the initial 8-day delay in filing the appeal. The court emphasized the strict application of limitation laws, highlighting the importance of adhering to timelines without leniency for negligent behavior. The dismissal was based on the principle that limitations must be enforced rigorously, without room for compassionate or equitable considerations in cases of misrepresentation or negligence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>