<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 498 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177593</link>
    <description>Cross objections are maintainable in an appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 because Section 41 applies the Code of Civil Procedure, including Order XLI Rule 22, subject to consistency with the Act. That right is confined to reliefs that could themselves be appealed under Section 39. Cross objections do not survive if the original appeal is itself incompetent or not maintainable in law; Order XLI Rule 22(4) preserves them only when an appeal is withdrawn or dismissed for default. An invalid appeal cannot extend limitation for a cross objection, which must independently satisfy competence and limitation requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 498 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177593</link>
      <description>Cross objections are maintainable in an appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 because Section 41 applies the Code of Civil Procedure, including Order XLI Rule 22, subject to consistency with the Act. That right is confined to reliefs that could themselves be appealed under Section 39. Cross objections do not survive if the original appeal is itself incompetent or not maintainable in law; Order XLI Rule 22(4) preserves them only when an appeal is withdrawn or dismissed for default. An invalid appeal cannot extend limitation for a cross objection, which must independently satisfy competence and limitation requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>