<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1093 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177589</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to refund Rs. 7.53 crores to the appellant within four weeks. Failure to comply would result in the respondents being liable to pay interest at 6% per annum. The court set aside the initial ruling, emphasizing that the respondents had no authority to retain the amount collected, as it did not fall under any statutory provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1093 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177589</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to refund Rs. 7.53 crores to the appellant within four weeks. Failure to comply would result in the respondents being liable to pay interest at 6% per annum. The court set aside the initial ruling, emphasizing that the respondents had no authority to retain the amount collected, as it did not fall under any statutory provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>