<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1053 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177591</link>
    <description>Director resignation took effect immediately upon written notice under the articles of association and could not be unilaterally withdrawn without company or board acceptance. The resulting lack of minimum board strength and quorum rendered subsequent board meetings, director and managing director appointments, and share transfer invalid. Statutory protection for acts of directors did not apply where office was usurped or appointments were invalid, while ratification, waiver, acquiescence, approbation and reprobation, and necessity did not cure the defects. Interim protection preserved disputed controlling shares and placed management with a temporary family-member arrangement under Company Law Board oversight pending resolution of the succession dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1053 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177591</link>
      <description>Director resignation took effect immediately upon written notice under the articles of association and could not be unilaterally withdrawn without company or board acceptance. The resulting lack of minimum board strength and quorum rendered subsequent board meetings, director and managing director appointments, and share transfer invalid. Statutory protection for acts of directors did not apply where office was usurped or appointments were invalid, while ratification, waiver, acquiescence, approbation and reprobation, and necessity did not cure the defects. Interim protection preserved disputed controlling shares and placed management with a temporary family-member arrangement under Company Law Board oversight pending resolution of the succession dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>