<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 500 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It held that the expenditure on distributing samples of medicines was allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act as it was for business purposes. The Tribunal disagreed with including the disallowance under section 14A in the book profit. Additionally, it ruled that disallowances under normal provisions need not be added under section 115JB. The order was pronounced on 18.12.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:07:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 500 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It held that the expenditure on distributing samples of medicines was allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act as it was for business purposes. The Tribunal disagreed with including the disallowance under section 14A in the book profit. Additionally, it ruled that disallowances under normal provisions need not be added under section 115JB. The order was pronounced on 18.12.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>