<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 496 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270704</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s applications for rectification/recall of the order, maintaining that the direction to reassess the involvement of human interface in the services provided was a conscious decision based on legal principles and not a mistake apparent from records. The Tribunal found the applications lacked merit and were not permissible under the law, affirming the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 496 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270704</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s applications for rectification/recall of the order, maintaining that the direction to reassess the involvement of human interface in the services provided was a conscious decision based on legal principles and not a mistake apparent from records. The Tribunal found the applications lacked merit and were not permissible under the law, affirming the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>