<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 495 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270703</link>
    <description>A charitable trust registered under section 12A may carry forward a deficit arising from excess application of income over receipts and adjust it against later-year income. The Tribunal treated such excess application as a deficit for the purposes of working out subsequent surplus, following coordinate bench views under the sections 11 and 12 exemption regime. It rejected the objection that charitable-status exemptions prevent carry forward merely because the shortfall arose in a year of application exceeding receipts. The assessee was accordingly entitled to carry forward the deficit and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 495 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270703</link>
      <description>A charitable trust registered under section 12A may carry forward a deficit arising from excess application of income over receipts and adjust it against later-year income. The Tribunal treated such excess application as a deficit for the purposes of working out subsequent surplus, following coordinate bench views under the sections 11 and 12 exemption regime. It rejected the objection that charitable-status exemptions prevent carry forward merely because the shortfall arose in a year of application exceeding receipts. The assessee was accordingly entitled to carry forward the deficit and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>