<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 491 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270699</link>
    <description>Ad hoc disallowance of professional expenses and estimated additions for household expenditure require specific defects, concrete material, or a demonstrated factual basis; absent such support, those additions were deleted. Bank-interest disallowance was also deleted because the Revenue had not established a factual basis to reject the claimed loan purpose despite missing supporting details. Cash purchases exceeding the statutory threshold attracted disallowance under section 40A(3), as the asserted splitting of payments below the limit was not accepted on the facts. The assessment was modified, with relief on the unsupported disallowances but retention of the cash-purchase disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 491 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270699</link>
      <description>Ad hoc disallowance of professional expenses and estimated additions for household expenditure require specific defects, concrete material, or a demonstrated factual basis; absent such support, those additions were deleted. Bank-interest disallowance was also deleted because the Revenue had not established a factual basis to reject the claimed loan purpose despite missing supporting details. Cash purchases exceeding the statutory threshold attracted disallowance under section 40A(3), as the asserted splitting of payments below the limit was not accepted on the facts. The assessment was modified, with relief on the unsupported disallowances but retention of the cash-purchase disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>