https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1914 The Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the eligibility of the appellant to benefit from the SSI exemption for products named Amigen, Sorgen, and Sigum. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the trade names do not belong to any specific entity, including M/s. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. Consequently, the denial of SSI exemption for these products was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1914 The Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the eligibility of the appellant to benefit from the SSI exemption for products named Amigen, Sorgen, and Sigum. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the trade names do not belong to any specific entity, including M/s. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. Consequently, the denial of SSI exemption for these products was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1914