<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 481 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270689</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision disallowing input service tax credit on repair charges, repair of company vehicles, and rent a cab services. It found the CENVAT credit valid under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as related to manufacturing activity. The Court emphasized the binding nature of the Division Bench judgment in Stanzen Toyotetsu India case, rejecting arguments against its precedent value due to the Central Government&#039;s policy. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit, with no substantial legal questions identified for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 481 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270689</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision disallowing input service tax credit on repair charges, repair of company vehicles, and rent a cab services. It found the CENVAT credit valid under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as related to manufacturing activity. The Court emphasized the binding nature of the Division Bench judgment in Stanzen Toyotetsu India case, rejecting arguments against its precedent value due to the Central Government&#039;s policy. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit, with no substantial legal questions identified for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>