<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 480 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the reduction of penalty under Section 78 and affirming the imposition of simultaneous penalties under Sections 76 and 78 for a specified period. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal precedents and interpretations of relevant provisions, ultimately deciding in favor of the Revenue on both issues raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 480 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the reduction of penalty under Section 78 and affirming the imposition of simultaneous penalties under Sections 76 and 78 for a specified period. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal precedents and interpretations of relevant provisions, ultimately deciding in favor of the Revenue on both issues raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>