https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270674 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reargue issues already considered in an appellate order. The challenge to the voting procedure turned on both statutory provisions and the factual matrix of the meeting, so it was not a pure question of law warranting review. The Court found that the controversy, including maintainability concerns and interlocutory relief issues, had already been examined, and that at most an alternative view was being advanced. No patent error was shown, and the review petitions failed. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270674 Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reargue issues already considered in an appellate order. The challenge to the voting procedure turned on both statutory provisions and the factual matrix of the meeting, so it was not a pure question of law warranting review. The Court found that the controversy, including maintainability concerns and interlocutory relief issues, had already been examined, and that at most an alternative view was being advanced. No patent error was shown, and the review petitions failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270674