<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 482 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177573</link>
    <description>The Tribunal delivered a mixed verdict on the appeals. It reversed the disallowance of depreciation on technical know-how and allowed the appellant&#039;s claims on entertainment expenditure, club payments, leasehold improvements, Modvat credit, write-off of obsolete items, club subscriptions, Section 10A exemption, bad debts, and miscellaneous expenses. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of guest house expenses and the AO&#039;s method for calculating travelling expenses under Rule 6D. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 1992-93 was partly allowed, with other years&#039; appeals dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 482 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177573</link>
      <description>The Tribunal delivered a mixed verdict on the appeals. It reversed the disallowance of depreciation on technical know-how and allowed the appellant&#039;s claims on entertainment expenditure, club payments, leasehold improvements, Modvat credit, write-off of obsolete items, club subscriptions, Section 10A exemption, bad debts, and miscellaneous expenses. However, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of guest house expenses and the AO&#039;s method for calculating travelling expenses under Rule 6D. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 1992-93 was partly allowed, with other years&#039; appeals dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>