<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 727 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of discount expenses for further verification while overturning the disallowance of car depreciation. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance of car depreciation, citing that non-registration under the Motor Vehicles Act does not preclude depreciation claims if the vehicle is owned and used by the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 727 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of discount expenses for further verification while overturning the disallowance of car depreciation. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance of car depreciation, citing that non-registration under the Motor Vehicles Act does not preclude depreciation claims if the vehicle is owned and used by the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>