<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 658 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the Arm&#039;s Length Price using the Transactional Net Margin Method for product replacement services and software development services. The Tribunal applied a turnover filter for comparables in the software development services case and instructed consistent treatment of foreign exchange gains/losses. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the reduction from export turnover for Section 10A deduction and directed relief on interest under Section 234D. Certain other grounds raised were not addressed as primary adjustments sufficed to align with the Arm&#039;s Length Price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 658 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the Arm&#039;s Length Price using the Transactional Net Margin Method for product replacement services and software development services. The Tribunal applied a turnover filter for comparables in the software development services case and instructed consistent treatment of foreign exchange gains/losses. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the reduction from export turnover for Section 10A deduction and directed relief on interest under Section 234D. Certain other grounds raised were not addressed as primary adjustments sufficed to align with the Arm&#039;s Length Price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>