<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 967 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed any income. The error in applying the tax rate was deemed a bona fide clerical mistake, corrected by the assessee during the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 967 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed any income. The error in applying the tax rate was deemed a bona fide clerical mistake, corrected by the assessee during the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>