<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Concluding Manufacturer&#039;s Case Ends Penalties for Traders u/r 26; No Need for Further Actions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26886</link>
    <description>Levy of personal penalty on co-noticees - when the proceedings against the manufacturer/assessee stand concluded on payment of disputed amount of duty plus interest plus 25% of the duty as penalty, there would be no sense in continuing the proceedings for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 against other persons like traders who had purchased the goods - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:41:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Concluding Manufacturer&#039;s Case Ends Penalties for Traders u/r 26; No Need for Further Actions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26886</link>
      <description>Levy of personal penalty on co-noticees - when the proceedings against the manufacturer/assessee stand concluded on payment of disputed amount of duty plus interest plus 25% of the duty as penalty, there would be no sense in continuing the proceedings for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 against other persons like traders who had purchased the goods - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:41:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>