<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the excess claim under section 80IB and prior period expenses were bona fide mistakes and not deliberate attempts to conceal income. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was withdrawn, and the appeal was allowed. The judgment was delivered on 19th January 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the excess claim under section 80IB and prior period expenses were bona fide mistakes and not deliberate attempts to conceal income. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was withdrawn, and the appeal was allowed. The judgment was delivered on 19th January 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>