<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 19 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that outward transportation of final products from the factory to customers&#039; premises does not qualify as &quot;input service&quot; for CENVAT credit. The demand on one party for the period before 8-8-2005 was upheld, while the demand for the rest was time-barred. Penalties on one party were set aside, and on the other, the case was remanded for re-quantification and reconsideration of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 19 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that outward transportation of final products from the factory to customers&#039; premises does not qualify as &quot;input service&quot; for CENVAT credit. The demand on one party for the period before 8-8-2005 was upheld, while the demand for the rest was time-barred. Penalties on one party were set aside, and on the other, the case was remanded for re-quantification and reconsideration of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>