<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 822 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177534</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was condoned, but the Supreme Court then dismissed the appeal without recording any further substantive reasoning. The only operative point available from the text is that the appeal did not succeed after the delay was excused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:34:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 822 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177534</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was condoned, but the Supreme Court then dismissed the appeal without recording any further substantive reasoning. The only operative point available from the text is that the appeal did not succeed after the delay was excused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>