<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 650 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177533</link>
    <description>The SC declined to interfere in a central excise matter where the quantum in dispute was very small and dismissed the civil appeal. The order indicates that, despite condoning delay, the Court found no reason to disturb the impugned decision on the limited monetary stakes involved. The substantive effect was dismissal of the appeal without examination of any broader legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:17:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 650 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177533</link>
      <description>The SC declined to interfere in a central excise matter where the quantum in dispute was very small and dismissed the civil appeal. The order indicates that, despite condoning delay, the Court found no reason to disturb the impugned decision on the limited monetary stakes involved. The substantive effect was dismissal of the appeal without examination of any broader legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>