<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT,  RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1904</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the assessment of a private limited company&#039;s rental income from flats and office accommodations. The Assessing Officer initially taxed the income under &#039;Income from property,&#039; disallowing depreciation claims. However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of assessing the income under &#039;Income from business,&#039; citing the company&#039;s memorandum of association. The Supreme Court emphasized the need to compute income according to the Income-tax Act&#039;s provisions and concluded that unless the rental income was proven to be derived from a property used for business purposes, it should be categorized as &#039;Income from house property.&#039; The court directed each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT,  RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1904</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the assessment of a private limited company&#039;s rental income from flats and office accommodations. The Assessing Officer initially taxed the income under &#039;Income from property,&#039; disallowing depreciation claims. However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of assessing the income under &#039;Income from business,&#039; citing the company&#039;s memorandum of association. The Supreme Court emphasized the need to compute income according to the Income-tax Act&#039;s provisions and concluded that unless the rental income was proven to be derived from a property used for business purposes, it should be categorized as &#039;Income from house property.&#039; The court directed each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>