<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 444 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order. It held that 15% of the gross income should be deducted before computing the surplus or deficit, allowing the assessee to carry forward the deficit. Relying on legal precedents, including the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court&#039;s judgment, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the computation method and carry forward of the deficit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 444 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order. It held that 15% of the gross income should be deducted before computing the surplus or deficit, allowing the assessee to carry forward the deficit. Relying on legal precedents, including the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court&#039;s judgment, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the computation method and carry forward of the deficit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>