<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 435 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270643</link>
    <description>Central excise duty was not leviable on towers sent out in knocked down condition solely for mandatory destructive testing under the supply contract, because the testing destroyed the towers and only scrap remained. The goods were not finally marketable excisable goods, and manufacture was treated as incomplete until the testing condition was fulfilled. The duty demand, along with interest and penalty, was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 435 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270643</link>
      <description>Central excise duty was not leviable on towers sent out in knocked down condition solely for mandatory destructive testing under the supply contract, because the testing destroyed the towers and only scrap remained. The goods were not finally marketable excisable goods, and manufacture was treated as incomplete until the testing condition was fulfilled. The duty demand, along with interest and penalty, was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>