<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c). It emphasized the necessity for the Revenue to prove concealment of income for penalty imposition, distinguishing between assessment and penalty proceedings. The Tribunal found that the appellant had disclosed all relevant facts and provided explanations that were not deemed false, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c). It emphasized the necessity for the Revenue to prove concealment of income for penalty imposition, distinguishing between assessment and penalty proceedings. The Tribunal found that the appellant had disclosed all relevant facts and provided explanations that were not deemed false, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>