https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177530 The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license until 31-12-2015 due to violations of CHALR Regulations but deemed permanent revocation too harsh. The forfeiture of the security deposit was upheld as the appellant failed to meet regulatory requirements. The appellant was found guilty of violating Regulations 13(a), 13(d), 13(e), and 13(n) but not Regulation 13(o). The appeal was disposed of with the specified conditions. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:17:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177530 The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license until 31-12-2015 due to violations of CHALR Regulations but deemed permanent revocation too harsh. The forfeiture of the security deposit was upheld as the appellant failed to meet regulatory requirements. The appellant was found guilty of violating Regulations 13(a), 13(d), 13(e), and 13(n) but not Regulation 13(o). The appeal was disposed of with the specified conditions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177530