<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 777 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that payments to non-resident shipping companies or their agents are governed by Section 172, not Section 194C of the Income-tax Act. Therefore, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under Section 194C was not required, and expenses disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) were deemed allowable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 777 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that payments to non-resident shipping companies or their agents are governed by Section 172, not Section 194C of the Income-tax Act. Therefore, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under Section 194C was not required, and expenses disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) were deemed allowable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>