<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 964 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177489</link>
    <description>A provision for audit fees was not hit by TDS disallowance because the liability had not crystallised at year-end and the payee was not yet identified; the disallowance was therefore deleted. Interest credited to employees&#039; provident fund accounts was also held allowable, as the amounts were credited to separate employee accounts and treated as belonging to the employees under the fund arrangement; that addition was likewise deleted. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues, and the first appellate relief was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:11:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 964 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177489</link>
      <description>A provision for audit fees was not hit by TDS disallowance because the liability had not crystallised at year-end and the payee was not yet identified; the disallowance was therefore deleted. Interest credited to employees&#039; provident fund accounts was also held allowable, as the amounts were credited to separate employee accounts and treated as belonging to the employees under the fund arrangement; that addition was likewise deleted. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues, and the first appellate relief was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>