<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 414 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270622</link>
    <description>The India-UK DTAA ceiling rate was held to include surcharge, and education cess was treated as an additional surcharge in substance. Because the treaty rate under Article 13 applied to the relevant income, no further surcharge or cess could be added over and above that rate. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions on similar treaty language and the character of education cess, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 414 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270622</link>
      <description>The India-UK DTAA ceiling rate was held to include surcharge, and education cess was treated as an additional surcharge in substance. Because the treaty rate under Article 13 applied to the relevant income, no further surcharge or cess could be added over and above that rate. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions on similar treaty language and the character of education cess, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>