<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 36 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1882</link>
    <description>LDPE lamination of HDPE woven fabrics was treated as manufacture of a distinct, marketable product classifiable under sub-heading 3926.90, so duty was payable. The exemption notifications were held inapplicable because the laminated fabrics were cleared for making bags and sacks, a covered exclusion. The plea of limitation and the valuation objection on cum-duty basis were remanded for fresh consideration on the existing records and proper quantification. Confiscation of land, building, plant and machinery, and the related redemption fine, were set aside because the show cause notice contained no proposal for such confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 36 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1882</link>
      <description>LDPE lamination of HDPE woven fabrics was treated as manufacture of a distinct, marketable product classifiable under sub-heading 3926.90, so duty was payable. The exemption notifications were held inapplicable because the laminated fabrics were cleared for making bags and sacks, a covered exclusion. The plea of limitation and the valuation objection on cum-duty basis were remanded for fresh consideration on the existing records and proper quantification. Confiscation of land, building, plant and machinery, and the related redemption fine, were set aside because the show cause notice contained no proposal for such confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>