<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 86 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, concluding that there was no justification for confiscation of goods, penalties were not warranted, and DEPB benefits should not be denied. The majority decision granted consequential relief to the appellants, setting aside penalties and affirming the entitlement to DEPB benefits based on the verification and acceptance of the export by Customs authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 86 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, concluding that there was no justification for confiscation of goods, penalties were not warranted, and DEPB benefits should not be denied. The majority decision granted consequential relief to the appellants, setting aside penalties and affirming the entitlement to DEPB benefits based on the verification and acceptance of the export by Customs authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>