<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 365 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270573</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the penalty to be levied only on the sustained addition amount. The Tribunal directed the penalty to be recomputed based on the upheld expenses, significantly reducing the penalty amount. The decision was pronounced on 20.11.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 365 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270573</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the penalty to be levied only on the sustained addition amount. The Tribunal directed the penalty to be recomputed based on the upheld expenses, significantly reducing the penalty amount. The decision was pronounced on 20.11.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>