<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 363 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270571</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the levy of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for all assessment years in question. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, and the penalties were upheld due to findings of unaccounted income and lack of proper records. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s actions indicated a clear intent to evade taxes and submit inaccurate income particulars, justifying the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 363 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270571</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the levy of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for all assessment years in question. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, and the penalties were upheld due to findings of unaccounted income and lack of proper records. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s actions indicated a clear intent to evade taxes and submit inaccurate income particulars, justifying the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>