<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 358 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It determined that the loans from the father and mother were genuine, discrepancies in the capital account were due to errors, sales to debtors were already included in previous years&#039; income, and discrepancies in sundry creditors were reconciled. Therefore, no additions were deemed necessary in these instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:04:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 358 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It determined that the loans from the father and mother were genuine, discrepancies in the capital account were due to errors, sales to debtors were already included in previous years&#039; income, and discrepancies in sundry creditors were reconciled. Therefore, no additions were deemed necessary in these instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>