<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the addition to the gross profit element on the disputed purchases. The decision emphasized the importance of providing supporting evidence to establish the genuineness of transactions and the application of a gross profit rate in cases of doubt regarding purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the addition to the gross profit element on the disputed purchases. The decision emphasized the importance of providing supporting evidence to establish the genuineness of transactions and the application of a gross profit rate in cases of doubt regarding purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>