<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270557</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal holding that the High Court&#039;s decision applies retrospectively. If the tax on transaction charges has been paid by the payee, then no TDS deduction is required under section 194J. The burden of proof lies with the assessee to demonstrate the payment of tax by the payee. The Tribunal emphasized the reasonable cause for not deducting TDS based on the disputed nature of the issue, considering conflicting decisions between the Tribunal and the High Court regarding the nature of transaction charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 20:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270557</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal holding that the High Court&#039;s decision applies retrospectively. If the tax on transaction charges has been paid by the payee, then no TDS deduction is required under section 194J. The burden of proof lies with the assessee to demonstrate the payment of tax by the payee. The Tribunal emphasized the reasonable cause for not deducting TDS based on the disputed nature of the issue, considering conflicting decisions between the Tribunal and the High Court regarding the nature of transaction charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>