<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 337 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to focus solely on the limited issue of outward freight availed beyond the limitation period, as per the remand order. The Commissioner was instructed to provide a fair hearing to the appellant and make a decision based on the specific aspects outlined in the remand order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 337 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to focus solely on the limited issue of outward freight availed beyond the limitation period, as per the remand order. The Commissioner was instructed to provide a fair hearing to the appellant and make a decision based on the specific aspects outlined in the remand order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>