https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270542 The Tribunal upheld the demands on Appellant number 1, M/s Shiva Steel Rolling Mills, for engaging in clandestine clearances of goods without duty payment, citing confessional statements and evidence supporting the activity. Appellant number 2, Mr. Pravesh Gautam, faced penalty imposition for receiving goods clandestinely from Appellant number 1, with the penalty amount reduced to Rs. 25,000. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the revenue, confirming the penalties on both appellants based on the evidence and statements presented, ultimately disposing of the appeals accordingly. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2016 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270542 The Tribunal upheld the demands on Appellant number 1, M/s Shiva Steel Rolling Mills, for engaging in clandestine clearances of goods without duty payment, citing confessional statements and evidence supporting the activity. Appellant number 2, Mr. Pravesh Gautam, faced penalty imposition for receiving goods clandestinely from Appellant number 1, with the penalty amount reduced to Rs. 25,000. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the revenue, confirming the penalties on both appellants based on the evidence and statements presented, ultimately disposing of the appeals accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270542