<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1018 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177469</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, a general surgeon, in a case concerning the disallowance of professional fees paid to his son under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT held that if the deductee pays the tax, no disallowance should be made under the provision. Additionally, the ITAT interpreted the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively, following precedents from the Karnataka High Court and the Gujarat High Court. As a result, the disallowance of the professional fees was overturned, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1018 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177469</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, a general surgeon, in a case concerning the disallowance of professional fees paid to his son under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT held that if the deductee pays the tax, no disallowance should be made under the provision. Additionally, the ITAT interpreted the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively, following precedents from the Karnataka High Court and the Gujarat High Court. As a result, the disallowance of the professional fees was overturned, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>