https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270536 The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petitions but declined to interfere with the High Court's concurrent factual findings. The Court exercised its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and found no basis to disturb the High Court's conclusions on the facts as recorded. Accordingly, the petitions were dismissed, and the condonation of delay did not alter the result or lead to any substantive review of the merits. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2018 17:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270536 The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petitions but declined to interfere with the High Court's concurrent factual findings. The Court exercised its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and found no basis to disturb the High Court's conclusions on the facts as recorded. Accordingly, the petitions were dismissed, and the condonation of delay did not alter the result or lead to any substantive review of the merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270536