<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 325 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270533</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that demurrage charges incurred post-importation should not be included in the assessable value of imported goods for customs duty purposes. The Court relied on precedent, including Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad v. M/s. Essar Steel Ltd., to support its decision. Demurrage charges were deemed a post-importation event and not part of the transaction value. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the significance of adhering to established legal precedents in determining customs duty levy assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 325 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270533</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that demurrage charges incurred post-importation should not be included in the assessable value of imported goods for customs duty purposes. The Court relied on precedent, including Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad v. M/s. Essar Steel Ltd., to support its decision. Demurrage charges were deemed a post-importation event and not part of the transaction value. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the significance of adhering to established legal precedents in determining customs duty levy assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>